Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tukohtene Falls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Considered the merge option but the concern about OR shows delete as the better option Spartaz Humbug! 07:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Tukohtene Falls

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

References only trivially mention the fall with no significant coverage, most sections require original research (which does not adhere to the fundamental policies). VickKiang (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Note: The creator of this article also wrote numerous other similar articles I currently listed for AfD for PROD since they do not have any indication of notability, but similar articles seem to be still created. VickKiang (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG and remind the author of these drafts that communication is required. - Due to the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, proper communication is extremely important. All editors are expected to respond to messages intended for them in a timely manner.


 * I see you have already left a comment regarding these drafts on his talk page, and he has not responded, nor does it look like he has read up on the notability guidelines. He is on the mobile app so it is entierly possible that he is not even seeing any thing you are leaving on his talk page or these deletion discussions. Maybe someone with more knowledge can find a way to notify him in a way that he will see. Rlink2 (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your responses! I am tentative of whether he could not see anything at all, because in a previous version of the page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JFox_0931&oldid=1079125286), he stated that "Please don’t delete there isn’t much about this small body of water online and I am working on finding more details about it. JFox 0931 (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)" for speedy deletion of another page I did (but later altered it because another editor advised me that it had refs and context). Should I notify him again? Cheers. VickKiang (talk) 02:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @VickKiang Well that edit was also made on mobile, so at the very least he is aware of the talk page's existence, and he is getting notified (or was). I would personally leave another message, this time reminding him about the importance of communication along with the current issues presented here. Rlink2 (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete One look at the photo, and this is not a notable waterfall. No coverage. Reywas92Talk 20:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Google News, Books and main Google searches did not turn any reliable sources that can support notability -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge into Stoney Creek (Delaware) per WP:GEOFEAT. This seems to be very similar to the listed example there of For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river. While this is not an island with only a name and location; a waterfall seems to be fundamentally similar enough that this should be able to be merged into the river's article. TartarTorte 15:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough reliable sources and references for coverage, which makes it not notable. Foodie Soul (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge into Stoney Creek (Delaware) per WP:GEOFEAT. Djflem (talk) 04:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.