Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tukuma national championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was The result of the debate was Delete all. This AfD was messy. Deathphoenix 13:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Tukuma national championship
The regional floor hockey league in a remote area of Latvia seems not to be relevant enough for an article in the English wikipedia. Gf1961 14:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Doesn't actually appear to be a national league. Average Earthman 17:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Four hits in google, all of them from wikipedia. No evidence of notability. Article is not sufficiently developed to demonstrate otherwise. I can't see this article ever being expanded significantly, assuming it even exists. &mdash; RJH 15:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

FK Kandava A single team playing in the regional floor hockey league in a remote area of Latvia seems not to be relevant enough for an article in the English wikipedia. Using abbreviated names does not help. Gf1961 15:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, they are in the national championship. I vote keep, and we can merge player details into it. However, I don't like the 'I think' that is included in the article. Are we not sure whether the team is Latvian?  James  Kendall   [talk] 16:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Please note, that the term national championship is fake. Tukums is a town in Kurzeme region in Latvia, all towns, rather villages of the Tukuma "national" championship, that I could identify on a map, come from places not further than 30 miles from Tukums. This is a district league. --Gf1961 16:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, OK. Delete then.  James  Kendall   [talk] 17:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable sporting team and delete all of the players below. Capitalistroadster 03:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; RJH 15:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Girts S A single player playing for a single team playing in the regional floor hockey league in a remote area of Latvia seems not to be relevant enough for an article in the English wikipedia. Using abbreviated name does not help. Gf1961 15:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. &mdash; RJH 15:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

such is the case for:

Āris M
 * Comment I've been smacked down for nominating athletes before so no vote -- Ruby  17:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Mārcis C
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Andis C
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Andis H
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Edgars H
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Gatis L
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Gatis C
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Girts S
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Edgars K
 * Delete nn. &mdash; RJH 15:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Mārcis C
 * Merge/Redirect minor sportspeople into their relevant team, or else Delete; I don't feel that playing a sport makes you intrinsically notable. -- Mithent 16:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * How notable is this team/league? We don't seem to have any verifiable evidence that this is more than an amateur team of not particularly great importance. Average Earthman 17:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. These don't appear to be notable.  Even the league article may not be notable.  Vegaswikian 07:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes they are all non-notable, almost cloned pages with no biographical information or evidence of notability. &mdash; RJH 15:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.