Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulasa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Tulasa

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not news. Here theNotability is temporary, related only to news. So fails Notability is not temporary. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems quite notable with a lot of media coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep--More than routine news coverage: "Following the public outcry, the governments of India and Nepal signed a 1985 cooperation agreement addressing the rescue and repatriation of Nepali girls trafficked into brothels in India."1 and 2. --Jmundo (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Not significant electronic media coverage. Despite the amount of coverage the article claims the story generated, there is very little evidence available to verify all those facts. A possible solution could be merging it with Prostitution in India, although I'm not sure how practical that is. LeaveSleaves talk 19:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Crimes or events that cause a change in law or regulations are generally considered notable. It's therefore not just a news event, but an event with far-reaching consequences. - Mgm|(talk) 16:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: See Mukhtaran Mai for similar bio articles. The notability is not temporary in such cases. These cases are used by human rights organizations to fight the crime so extremely notable I would say. But article might need some more reliable sources. -- GP Pande  20:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.