Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulio Febres Cordero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Tulio Febres Cordero

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG, or WP:ACADEMIC. He's written some books, but has an extremely low citation count (the highest being 49). Can't find any in-depth sources about this person.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per the edit summary that I gave when contesting WP:PROD deletion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Multiple sources about him in Venezuelan sources, including for example this article from El Nacional that says "he left countless works as a contribution to Venezuelan history" and was "author of the most famous legends of the Andean folklore", and a similarly themed article from El Universal calling him the "patriarch of letters in Mérida". Apparently thought to be significant enough in Mérida that a municipality is named after him: es:Municipio Tulio Febres-Cordero. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Spanish isn't one of my strongest languages but I can understand enough to see from a scan of the news and book search results that he also has an avenue, a library and a cultural centre named after him. Citation count is utterly irrelevant for a historian who died in 1938. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - A quick Google Search turns up plenty of reliable sources that show notability. --  Dane talk  20:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources found by Arxiloxos do seem to indicate passing WP:GNG. There's more as Dane states. --Oakshade (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.