Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulip Advertising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  00:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Tulip Advertising
"This article cites no sources. The author does not assert why a failed venture is of encyclopedic importance.  I guess the author figured that anyone interested would google them, to try to figure out what was so important about the business that it merited an entry in Wikipedia.DeleteTheRingess 22:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, being a failed business venture isn't notable. No mention in any major media, I couldn't find mentions to this outside the creators' blogs. - Bobet 23:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, failed. Stifle 20:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per the author's writing cited above. B.Wind 00:17, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.