Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulsa Town Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Tulsa Town Hall

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Bringing notable speakers does not confer notability. No significant coverage can be found. Declined PROD, removed without comment. Ravendrop 00:45, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure what else is conflicting. This is a non-profit organization in which more content will be added for general knowledge. Please explain why it would be up for deletion when the "notable" has been removed from the article. Nswitzer (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * This issue is not with the word 'notable,' but with the notability of organization. Notability is demonstrated by in-depth third party coverage about the organization, which does not seem to exist for this group.  (Note that bringing notable people to speak does not infer notability on the organization (see WP:NOTINHERITED).  Also have a look at WP:ORG and WP:GNG for more ideas on what is and what isn't notable.  Ravendrop 17:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. However this article could be recreated in the future so I say put it in subpage for the time being and I will work on sources to back everything up and to meet WP:GNG.-- Dch eagle  18:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.