Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunde Eso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 21:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Tunde Eso

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing independant in Reliable sources. Everything in the article is sourced to his interviews and articles written by him in newspapers. No independent, in-depth coverage. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Nominator's comment struck; indefinitely banned sockpuppet.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. The nomination makes no sense. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Your sources have no SIGCOV, and are not independent. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Comment struck from indefinitely banned sockpuppet.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * this is not a reliable source, it's a blog masquerading as a news outlet. this is an interview and not independent coverage. I haven't a clue what to make of this source, as it appears to be an opinion piece and I can't tell if it's an editorial endorsed piece or not. Praxidicae (talk) 15:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

UTC)
 * Delete fails the basic requirements of ANYBIO. ——  Serial # 15:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, however I am leaving the nomination open because it has some merit. MER-C 17:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - after reviewing sources. Per WP:GNG. Nominator was a sock as well, so fishy nom.BabbaQ (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject of article clearly meet WP:GNG; being covered by multiple reliable sources which include Guardian, The Nation e.t.c Kaizenify (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.