Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuneCore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.  Singu larity  01:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

TuneCore
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appeared on AFD in July/August 2006; introduced into WP:PROD workstream August 2007 with the notation "Advertisement, Self-promotion." Previous AFD started with the notion the article was advertising and closed with 'no consensus'. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Slightly self-promo, but not so much as to be spammy.  Notability shines. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the tiger. Passes WP:RS, doesn't seem overly spammy. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 02:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep looks like WP:SPAM, but passes WP:N and WP:RS, so keep. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 02:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The article's subject has received significant media coverage, thus its notable. Sasha Callahan 04:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It could maybe use a once-over to make it sound less like an advertisement, but it's received enough attention in my book to make it worth keeping. fuzzy510 04:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Just because an article is bad doesn't necessarily mean it should be deleted. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable. If it seems like and advertisement, fix it. i said 03:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject is notable, if promotional language has crept in sofixit.  Yamaguchi先生 04:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.