Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuneDNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  BLACK KITE  16:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

TuneDNA
Fails WP:WEB. Speedy was present, but removed with an unqualified claim of why the editor felt it wasn't speediable. No third party references, launched only 3 weeks ago. Unless there is an unpresented media storm surrounding this notability is highly unlikely. Crossmr (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete google news has squadoosh, google main search turns up this article, the applications home website, and some download sites. Little else.  Not much here to hang an article on, notability-wise.  Someday in the future, it may be the greatest thing since sliced bread, but we just don't know, now do we... --Jayron32| talk | contribs  03:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable source and the subject at hand not notable. Chris!  c t 07:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Jayron. Master of Puppets Care to share?  05:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.