Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunnel Vision (Pop Smoke song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  12:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Tunnel Vision (Pop Smoke song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The song doesn't pass WP:NSongs. The only independent coverage of the article comes from the lawsuit and those sources, HipHopDX, AllHipHop, despite being reliable doesn't address the song at all regarding its composition, lyrics, or the reception all of that comes from album reviews and the background info from an interest third party. Charting does not indicate that a song is notable. That information regarding the lawsuit could be merged into the parent album/Pop Smoke's article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Who has time for this stupid shit? WP:SNOW close nomination due to chart performance (which MarioSouldTruthFan is still trying his darndest to not acknowledge the significance of) and the overwhelming amount of coverage of the lawsuit gives it independent notability. The sources about the lawsuit don't have to talk about the composition. They are talking about the song within the lawsuit and other sources are talking about the composition. Look at how much there is to talk about that lawsuit. Merging it into the album article would make it WP:TOOBIG. 👨x🐱 (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment This isn't a vote! and I've struck it per WP:IGNORE., knock off the personal attacks against the nominator, now.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the comment, but please keep it WP:COOL, Nate. I wrote this comment when I was in a very heated mood, and I have a sarcastic side that I never know whether it'll be misinterpreted by other editors. I apologize if my comment came off as a PA, but striking an entire comment (including parts that were actual reasons for my vote which made up most the comment) does not solve anything and makes discussions only more difficult. 👨x🐱 (talk) 21:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Due to Billboard charting and enough supporting references. Lesliechin1 (talk) 08:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The song has charted at Billboard and almost all the sources seem reliable. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.