Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turaga na Ravunisa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete for now, but if a reference is found it may be speedy undeleted. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 02:21Z 

Turaga na Ravunisa

 * — (View AfD)

I cannot find this title listed in any authoritative publication, so it may constitute original research. I myself am abstaining on this vote - but giving other users the opportunity to decide for themselves. David Cannon 09:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per. nom. M e eples ( talk )( email ) 10:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:V. MER-C 11:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - existence of title verified at ai cavuti. Delete the reference to Turaga na Rasau and it should be fine. --Xorkl000 13:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: That doesn't appear to be a reliable source. -- Visviva 04:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletions.   --  gadfium  04:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC) "
 * Just a minute Turaga Na Ravunisa is a real title and is the recognised cheifly title for Lomaloma Village the reference from 'Ai Cavuti' from the Book 'Bula Vakavanua' is incorrect it correctly lists it as Yavusa Buca Turaga Na Ravunisa but according to Fijian affairs board records the Turaga i Taukei or head of the whole tribe of Yavusa Buca is the Turaga Na Rasau a title which supesedes the Ravunisa in the Tikina of Lomaloma again these facts I need to verify and am now under going that process to make public private document recording traditional hsitory, titles and lineage of Fiji in reference only to the Tikina of Lomaloma Malo MAIKELI MB 00:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unverified, unverifiable WP:OR and I could find no mention of it here as suggested which  is a blog spot anyway.--Dakota 00:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.