Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turaglas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect; no consensus to delete but clear consensus that this level and form of detail is not appropriate. No merging done; feel free to add anything relevant to Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons). -- Visviva 13:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Turaglas

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject of the article is not notable in the real world, article has solely an in-world context Pilotbob 15:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with nom, pure fancruft.  -- Blind  Eagle  talk ~ contribs  19:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Disagree with nomination. Try improving the article, or suggesting improvements before nominating for deletion.Shemeska 20:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 21:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources providing any claim to notability outside of game universe. Sheffield Steel talkstalk 21:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Shemeska.--Robbstrd 00:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons) -- it already has a list that could be expanded with a limited amount of the detail from this article. Pinball22 16:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this article is written in-universe perspective which treats plot summary as if it were real and ignoring the requirement for sourced analysis. --Gavin Collins 10:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Pinball22 Percy Snoodle 11:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge Adequate sourcing and notability. Colonel Warden 12:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:NOT and it's unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability per WP:FICT. Without reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, it's impossible to establish notability per WP:N with any amount of rewriting or cleanup. Doctorfluffy 19:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.