Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbine Toucan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete can be recreated if reliable sources can be found. --Salix alba (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Turbine Toucan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nothing to indicate the significance of this aircraft. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —TreasuryTag talk contribs  17:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There is some info on this plane on the web. Examples  and, but i'm not 100% sure if these satisfy WP:N.  For now neutral but interested in others opinions on the sources.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * A bit of a puzzle. It's obviously notable to the degree that everyone who follows that sort of thing appears to know about it. Online justification for notability doesn't fit the standard rules, however. It may be necessary to go after print sources. Perhaps delete but without prejudice. Mangoe (talk) 00:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to re-creation if/once notability can be established. Cube lurker's link [2] above appears to be just reproducing a press release; link [1] is much better but not enough by itself i think. To quote from that, "It will be up to Erickson to develop an airshow program featuring the Turbine Toucan for the 2008 airshow season." If that succeeds (I almost said 'gets off the ground') then there's likely to be little problem establishing notability in a few months' time. In the meantime, WP shouldn't be used to aid their marketing to airshows. Qwfp (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.