Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Brazilians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Turkish Diaspora. Tone 09:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Turkish Brazilians

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unclear that this meets WP:GNG. An diaspora of people who reside at the intersection of two nationalities isn't inherently notable. Perhaps redirect to Turkish diaspora.  SITH   (talk)   18:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete/merge per nom, and throw in the see also page Turkish Venezuelan too. There are 20,000 combinations of [nationality] in [country]; while many certainly have large enough populations to be notable, 6,000 individuals for this article with a lack of further detail does not suggest notability at all. Reywas92Talk 21:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Ugh, please delete nonsense like Turks in Moldova too; there are several of these. Reywas92Talk 21:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge (to Turkish Diaspora) - nom's arguments are correct, but since Brazil isn't currently in the Diaspora article, and should be, it needs to be a merge. While in this particular case GNG might also apply, the key argument for all of these is WP:REDUNDANTFORK. However, we can't decide mid-AfD which other articles should go. There is a place for separate articles to cover large country groupings. As to whether that should be some ad hoc decision or should be written up I've no idea (numbers vs % of population vs coverage would be a hell of a squabble). Nosebagbear (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested by Nosebagbear Mccapra (talk) 08:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.