Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Women's Basketball League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. North America1000 06:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Turkish Women's Basketball League

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another contested redirect without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage, just a few mentions, to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 11:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Basketball,  and Turkey. DreamRimmer (talk) 11:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Searches in websites themselves do reveal some sources like match reports and announcements. Sadly I don't have the time to go through them to see what really counts towards the GNG so I'll just drop it here if anyone else wants to take a look: Hürriyet, Milliyet, Sözcü, Sabah. ~Styyx Talk ? 14:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The article, as a second-level women's basketball league affiliated to FIBA Europe, has significant reliable sources to meet GNG. As the comment above says, news, announcements and reports may be found in several sources. Oltnilhn (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, no evidence of passing GNG or ORG. The above is just routine sports news about games and individuals, nothing that shows notability. BEFORE showed database, routine sports news, and primary, nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. I agree with Oltnilhn rv to redirect, this should not be a redirect, because nothing in article is properly sourced. Oppose Draft because nothing will change in the next six months that will show notability and this would just be a backdoor to deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  02:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  17:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tim. Aintabli (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep the league seems to be getting considerable coverage in major Turkish media, such as Milliyet and Hürriyet. Alvaldi (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per source bundles above. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.