Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish women in literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Appears it is an independently notable subject after all. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 14:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Turkish women in literature

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable topic. Some WP:OR, an indiscriminate list of writers/poets, and just very little content generally. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 19:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Not the least indiscriminate, as the list is composed, as it should be, only of those who have WP articles. This should be expanded into a proper list by giving some information about them individually, which could not be equally well done as a category.  DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Technically, it's not, as there's a redlink in there, but that's being nitpicky, and easily resolved. Is there any coverage of women in Turkish literature in WP:RS? If there isn't, this is a needless content fork of any Turkish literature articles. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 08:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable subject, topic of research, academic journal articles, news story, anthologies Division by gender is justified because of the academic focus on women's writing and women writers as a distinct topic. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, consider this withdrawn then! Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 14:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.