Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turn up and go


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Turn up and go
Non-notable neologism. Cheese Sandwich 02:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable neologism. (They coined a term for a bus that shows up on schedule?) --Xrblsnggt 02:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This comment deserves to be BJAODNed for our children. And the article, weak delete. --Ouro 11:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Zos 02:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 04:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 04:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dionyseus 07:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Although this actual term is specific to one bus company, the concept is becoming more popular with bus companies globally.  To answer Xrblsnggt's point, the issue is that these buses _don't_ have to run to a tight schedule.  Let's say you expect 120 passengers an hour on a particular route.  You can either run a bus that can carry 60 passengers every 30 mins - which means that it has to keep to the schedule accurately, the passengers have to know what that schedule is, and, if they miss the bus they intended to catch, they have a 29-minute wait ahead of them; or, you follow this concept, run a bus that can carry 20 passengers every 10 minutes, so that the passengers don't need to know exactly when the buses run - they just Turn Up at the bus-stop, knowing they'll have a maximum wait of 9 mins, so they can Go at their convenience rather than the convenience of the bus company.  Perhaps something about the concept could go into the Bus rapid transit article?  Tevildo 10:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.