Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turney Stevens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 03:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Turney Stevens

 * – ( View AfD View log )

May possibly fail WP:N. Original article was practically a resume before cutting down to a single point per discussion at relevant noticeboard. Phearson (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 *  Delete , subject does not appear to be notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  23:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I found some news stories about him and re-expanded the article based on them. Most of them are just local newspaper items that don't really speak to his notability, but I think the BusinessWeek piece and the Ethisphere award are enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per David Eppstein, it looks like he meets WP:BIO. Qrsdogg (talk) 15:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 09:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

 Weak Keep, Business week is a good enough source, --Nuujinn (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.