Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turnkey Consulting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Turnkey Consulting

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable run of the mill IT security consultancy - lacks significant coverage, fails WP:CORP, the third party refs in the article (that work) don't cover the company in any major detail and have the feel of vendor provided text. Codf1977 (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete. This calls itself a global IT security consultancy which sells its services to customers using SAP as their Enterprise Resource Planning software.  Article reads like pure corporate puffery, and as such is unambiguous advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Links to references now corrected and further reference added. As stated, the entry was intended to be purely factual. There is no intention for this to be advertising. Wording was carefully considered based on other, similar wikipedia entries for other consultancies. Apologies if any offence caused - feel free to take the page down if it really is in contradiction with wikipedia policies but I would prefer constructive suggestions as to more appropriate wording. If further evidence is required to prove notability please advise whether or not further, similar articles would suffice.User:richard_james_hunt


 * Delete. The links provided do not establish notability as in coverage by multiple independent sources, they are all primary sources, maybe except for that single newsfeed in note #1. De728631 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.