Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Article improved (from one sentence!!) and nom withdrawn Black Kite 21:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sourced not notable. Was going to speedy for patent nonsense but it does seem to exist so its their for not nonsense I guess. Also included is a redirect page to the main 'article' Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 18:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried and tried but couldn't find much....it was shown at Sundance Film Festival last year and has just come out on DVD, which I guess is why this article has appeared. But, no reviews apart from a user-generated one on imDb and a couple of similar ones. I hope someone finds something for it but it looks unlikely Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I found this review, but I'm not sure about reliability. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be a real film with a few secondary source reviews, and fairly wide albeit limited multi-country distribution. Gigs (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * While the film itself may be notable (per Gigs), the current state of the article is worthless. I'd go with delete, unless there's some source of reliable information that can be incorporated. TheFeds 20:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nonsense, if the subject is found notable by consensus I'll rewrite it myself, just need some references Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedily Delete does not meet WP:MOVIE.keystoneridin! (talk) 20:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment OK I've tidied it up a lot, but still needs more info, anyone finds some good references or info hit me up Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as I have done more renovation. Now meets WP:NF. Through decent reviews and notable cast. Will be adding more reviews to critical reaponse. Search was easier once I realized it was listed under three searchable titles: Turtles Are Surprisingly Fast Swimmers, Kame wa Igai to Hayaku Oyogu, and Turtles Swim Faster Than Expected.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is now well-written and with the sources added by User:MichaelQSchmidt, meets the general notability guideline if I'm not mistaken. I've redirected Kame wa Igai to Hayaku Oyogu and Turtles Swim Faster Than Expected to this article as alternate titles. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Now has sources, and there is more. --Apoc2400 (talk) 10:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep briefly looked over sources and they seem fine. Nice job MQS! Hobit (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Deletion as nominator -- Article is significantly different from when proposed Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. My own hat is doffed to Dylanfromthenorth who made me believe from his words that a resuce was worth doing. Best regards to all.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.