Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuscany Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Tuscany Camp

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was draftified in the hopes of improving sourcing, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. It gets some mentions, but there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it meets GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Other than its own sources, there has not been significant coverage. The camp's own website is by definition not independent and thus not reliable as the only sources. Bearian (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.