Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tusk (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   'Withdrawn. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 22:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Tusk (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources for this independent film. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 20:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – barely. I believe it established just enough coverage to have its own article here on Wikipedia, as shown here . ShoesssS Talk 20:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per "sources of notability are available". The article itself need not be deleted simply because it is not expansive, inciteful, well written or heavily sourced. That notability exists is enough.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Update: Have expanded, added links, wikified, and sourced.. Long term notability per WP:GNG and WP:NF has been established.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.