Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutkowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Tutkowski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a family that does not appear to be notable. Lots of very general uncited claims, but nothing that would show notability. Renata (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. I have connected this to pl wiki article. Mentioned on two pages according to the index of ; snippet view, can't see to what extent they are discussed in the book proper; page 91 has a box? about it, but I can read only the first line saying that the family belongs to one of the old clans in the city. The snippet view of few paragraphs in suggests this book devotes several paragraphs to it ("Musiałem długo szukać, zanim trafiłem na ślady pozwalające na odtworzenie sagi rodu Tutkowskich. Część mieszkającej jeszcze w Gdyni rodziny już nie pamiętała o swoich przodkach..."). I am a bit worried that the article may contain some WP:OR, but the family is probably notable, through it's a minor footnote type of historical material. But there is probably sufficient coverage in those local historians for GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Piotrus, the pl wiki article seems to have been created by the same person. The items you found are sufficient to demonstrate that the family existed and the article is not a hoax, but don't seem sufficient to establish notability (really, they are scrapping the bottom of a barrel). Given that the article is likely full of WP:OR and that there is no way to clean it up due to lack of sources, I suggest deletion. Renata (talk) 02:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It is borderline. I would be fine with merging it to some Gdynia history article, but we don't really have a good target. I am standing by my weak keep as I think the two sources presented suffice for GNG, if just at the very edge of the guideline spirit. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Piotrus.4meter4 (talk) 02:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.