Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutor4u


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted (G11/A7) as spam / non-notable. Salted as well. Black Kite 23:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Tutor4u

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable company or service provider; content continually reintroduced (might suggest a bit of protection?) A bot has also tagged it as a blatant copyvio of http://tutor4u.me.uk/aboutus.html. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 20:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Why should it be deleted? Please inform us --ZeejaysUK (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)ZLJAY
 * Delete, probably speedy. Not sure that it's a copyvio (it uses quotes but rest only comes back to Wikipedia from a Google search), but the creator is ZeejaysUK, the owners of Tutor4u are called Zeejays, and the article reads like an advertisement. Also no assertion of notability. Esteffect (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It's been speedied once; the same guy reintroduced the text. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me!  /  Talk to me!  ←at≈:→ 21:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since you ask, the article and/or its subject fall foul of:
 * Notability_(organizations_and_companies): "Advertising is prohibited as an official Wikipedia policy."
 * Notability (organizations and companies): "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources."
 * Copyright violations: "If all of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement [...] the page will normally need to be deleted."
 * NOT: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred."
 * Conflict of interest: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising or self-promotion, or a vanity press. As such, it should contain only material that complies with its content policies."

Richard Pinch (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.