Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutoreasy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 04:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Tutoreasy
Advertisement JPD (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as ad. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 11:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Likewise linkspam at tutor. Flapdragon 13:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete We need a speedy class for ads like this! Avi 21:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.Blnguyen 00:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Hang on! I placed this information here, as it is the first online example I can find of a "market for services" - where the whole service is carried out online, end to end, in particulary taking account of the post-eBay/Skype/VOIP world. If the wording seems too much like an "ad" the it can be changed. Companies are already listed on Wikipedia, so that in itself is not a cause for concern. The question is whether the entry adds value to users - which I think it does. Lets start a debate around that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cekbrooks (talk • contribs), at 11:44, 10 February 2006


 * No, the question is whether the company can be considered notable (some guidelines here). We might also ask whether Cekbrooks has an interest in the company concerned? All edits by that username have promoted "Tutoreasy". Flapdragon 14:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.