Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuxGuitar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete (per stronger, policy based arguments}  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

TuxGuitar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable software - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete RS coverage appears limited to two product listings, no reviews of the software. Ghits, although plentiful, are limited to forum posts, download locations and blogs. No evidence of notability TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 16:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Take a look into Category:Guitar-related_software and tell me how is that all those programs have the right to be kept and TuxGuitar doesn't, TuxGuitar is my main guitar-learning tool and is as good as the other open source programs listed in this category. --Arias Levhita (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment please see WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:USEFUL/WP:ILIKEIT, none of which are valid keep arguments. There is no evidence this software meets relevant guidelines. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 21:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: This is a useful and well designed free software, handily cross-platform and compliant to exchange of file formats with other softwares. Because it is still in current development new versions are being released now and then with increased capabilities. There is every reason to suppose Wikipedia users would want to know about this programme. --wayland (talk) 06:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's still not notable yet. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * delete in the absence of evidence that anyone is using it. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.