Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuzanni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedied, A7. Opabinia regalis 05:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Tuzanni


I am also nominating the following related pages because of the two characters' apparent connection and because both articles have the same creator: Both are nonexistent Naruto characters. Unusually, the articles' creator has made attempts to link other articles to them, though most have been reverted due to the fictionality of the fictional characters. Qualify at the very least as WP:OR and WP:CRUFT. ~SnapperTo 21:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Rouge student
 * Delete both. If they do exist, merge onto a single page of minor Naruto characters. Stebbins 00:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 00:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Asquimm 01:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both, per previous deletions of other Naruto fanfic characters (see here, here, here and here). Wikipedia is not for things you write up in fanfiction one day. Both characters, as fan characters, fail WP:FICT. NeoChaosX (he shoots, he scores!) 03:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both, fan-created characters without any verification whatsoever. ColourBurst 04:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete both Fan made / fanfiction characters are not notable. A7: Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. -Kunzite 22:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete both As above.MightyAtom 23:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.