Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twed Towers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Twed Towers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Notability is not inherited from tenants. There is advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. This is a nice, normal, building, not an encyclopedic topic.  // Timothy ::  talk  21:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Neutral There's a lot of hits because the building houses Uganda's main commercial courts, was the subject of a bomb threat, and the ground floor ceiling caved in, so its notability isn't zero, but I can't find anything showing that it's 100% notable yet (like an article about its construction.) SportingFlyer  T · C  22:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:SIGCOV, WP:MILL, and my standards for tall buildings. It sounds like a very ordinary building, only nine stories high.. and the tenants are not world-famous. The coverage seems local and ordinary. It fails the standards at NBUILD including my own. Bearian (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.