Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweeple Film Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 10:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Tweeple Film Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Probably just a 2011 phenomenon that died afterwards. The awards have to be notable to stay on Wikipedia by at least being consistently given. They also have to be considered notable enough by third part sources. All sources found on net talk about the newness of awarding style but nothing about the notability as such. Also, the article has no links to any enwiki articles. We have plenty of articles covering Bollywood stuff and still no editor has so far considered it worth to mention this award in any biography/film/award-lists articles. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * and WP:INDAFD: "Tweeple Film Awards" "Tweeple Awards" "Tweeples" "twi-fi awards"
 * and WP:INDAFD: "Tweeple Film Awards" "Tweeple Awards" "Tweeples" "twi-fi awards"
 * and WP:INDAFD: "Tweeple Film Awards" "Tweeple Awards" "Tweeples" "twi-fi awards"
 * and WP:INDAFD: "Tweeple Film Awards" "Tweeple Awards" "Tweeples" "twi-fi awards"


 * Keep per topic meeting WP:GNG. In reading WP:NTEMP we accept that happening in the past does not make something non-notable.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to be a one-time Twitter poll —Мандичка YO 😜 23:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The explosion of Mount Saint Helens happened just once too. Does that men we can ignore all the press about it?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Two thing: (i) An award in Bollywood genre should be supposed to be annual and if it lasted only one year, its notability is doubtful. So even if TEMP things are notable, recurring events shouldn't be temporary by definition. (ii) Also, as stated before, non of the third party references aren't counting this as a "notable award". Apart from the press releases, many of which are interviews of the founder, there isn't much lasting effect here. The Bollywood community on en-wiki itself is vastly active and we have plenty GAs/FAs/FLs and none seem to be mentioning this award anywhere. Apart from well meaning editors, this genre of articles is also infested by socks and PRs and still has no mention anywhere; implying no one treats it notable. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable one-shot Twitter poll per Dharmahyksha's great explanation.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete One time wonder with no such great event notability in the past. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 04:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.