Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve Men of Christmas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Twelve Men of Christmas

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Very recent movie. No evidence of notability, indeed no evidence at all. &mdash; RHaworth 13:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 *  Delete Keep with serious clean up could find no significant coverage of this film at all, other than the reprints of Lifetime's initial press release. Despite its starring a "Tony Award winner and Emmy nominee", as they state, no one seems to have noticed it at all. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to keep per below and goes to drink more coffee as my Google-fu failed me today. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per, , , , , , , , and . All found on the first two pages of a Google search. Joe Chill (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe Chill. Based on the amount of reviews by different people listed, they clearly noticed thus making this pass WP:GNG. - Mgm|(talk) 12:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Some of the references found by Joe Chill have been incorporated into the article, meets WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 18:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of coverage of this.  D r e a m Focus  19:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.