Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve South


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Twelve South

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, promotional, IP declined CSD. [[User:GregJackP|

GregJackP ]] [[User talk:GregJackP| Boomer! ]] 03:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Comment : Article seems promotional but when I searched for Twelve South, I was able to find some independent secondary sources for Twelve South's product HiRise. Some of them are:
 * http://9to5mac.com/2013/08/11/review-twelve-south-hirise-stand-for-iphone-5-ipad-mini/
 * http://www.macrumors.com/2013/08/06/twelve-south-releases-adjustable-hirise-stand-for-iphone-5-and-ipad-mini/
 * http://www.imore.com/twelve-south-releases-hirise-charging-stand-iphone-5-and-ipad-mini
 * http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/twelve-south-hirise-for-iphone/

Unable to decide whether this page should be deleted, kept or a page for HiRise should be created. SmackoVector (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

As the page is still being edited and more information and additional sources are being added this is reducing the promotional bias in the article. As the company creates products that reflect the design ethos of Apple this shows the importance of the subject and as such should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelbarber19 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)  — Samuelbarber19 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, per WP:ARTSPAM, hardly any coverage in mainstream sources. - DonCalo (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough independent sources that aren't spam. Ultraviolet (talk) 22:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.