Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twice: Seize the Light


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Twice: Seize the Light

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Documentary does not meet WP:GNG- references consists of WP:ROUTINE announcements. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as has reviews in reliable sources such as Korea Herald and Cosmopolitan with other coverage such as Billboard which have all been added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources indicated above are considered reliable except maybe the Korea Herald. Doing a WP:BEFORE reveals little to nothing else and certainly nothing that rises to the level that comes close to passing the notability guideline. Must receive sigcov in multiple reliable and independent secondary sources. Fails this according to WP:N. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 15:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Incorrect, Billboard is a very reliable source and the Cosmopolitan is a reliable source for uncontroversial topics like film reviews, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - agree with Atlantic306. Passes GNG (Both Atlantic306 and the movie;). Kolma8 (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.