Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twilight Dementia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted for no assertion of notability. The album content has been moved elsewhere, the article about the band gives no indication of notability or coverage. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Twilight Dementia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not appear to satisfy WP:BAND. Evidently this band's article originated as a messy overwrite of a different article for someone else's album of the same name. The article also included info about their 2007 album which I deleted today because it should go in a separate album article. But for the band, they have not achieved enough notice for a WP article. I found one third-party interview here and one substantial album review here although it's a blog. Everything else available on the band is social media and a few listings for live appearances. D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - You beat me to it. I noticed that there were two articles combined into one, so I split one off (Twilight Dementia (DragonForce album)) and left this. I had to go AFK, but listing this at AfD was my next step! I definitely agree, delete. Only sources I'm finding are the band's website, MySpace, Twitter, etc, other than those two reviews you mention. However, the first review is bare-boned at best, and the second seems to be a hobbyist review. It's useful to search "twilight dementia -dragonforce", because that DragonForce album generates a lot of other results. Anyway, doesn't seem to fit a single criterion for WP:BAND. — GorillaWarfare talk-review me! 19:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe what happened is someone created a legitimate article for the DragonForce album, and then a person who wanted to create an article for this other band (also called Twilight Dementia, coincidentally) messed it up by removing the text about the DragonForce album and simply over-writing it with stuff about this other band. Gorilla, you did a good job clearing that mess up. For everyone else, note that the article for Twilight Dementia (DragonForce album) is legit and not part of this discussion. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, something like that. Sorry if it sounded like I was introducing the DragonForce album to this discussion. — GorillaWarfare talk-review me! 19:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This doesn't meet WP:BAND standards, nor does it seems notable in general. — W aterfox  ( talk ) 21:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find no evidence that it meets WP:BAND let alone WP:Notability --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Procedural Comment: There is now also a proposal for speedy deletion for the band article, possible because it has only two sentences and makes no claim of notability. Before I started the AfD today, there was a little more specific information concerning the band's 2007 album, but I deleted it because it was stuff that should have been in an album-specific article. Not sure if that matters at this point, but that's why the band article is so skimpy. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 01:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.