Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Peaks in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Twin Peaks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 00:18Z 

Twin Peaks in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete - this is an indiscriminate, unreferenced collection of every time a particular show was parodied, mentioned or possibly referenced in any TV show or magazine, regardless of the importance of the reference to the source or to Twin Peaks. We don't need a list of every time someone says "twin peaks" on TV. Otto4711 13:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge the more noteworthy items to the main Twin Peaks article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this goes far beyond the stated intent of assessing the cultural impact of the show and has reached the territory of pointless trivia. Andrew Levine 15:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, instead of criticising it, why not help to improve it? Lugnuts 19:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Because I don't believe it can be improved, because as a concept for a Wikipedia article it is fundamentally flawed. Otto4711 20:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Trying is the first step towards failure, eh? Amazing. Lugnuts 12:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:DICK. Otto4711 19:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha, lame. Lugnuts 19:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete it is trivia.-MsHyde 19:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced The list is almost entirely unreferenced. Delete, and merge the one or two items that might be referenced into the main article. Dugwiki 21:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, wrap in plastic, and throw in the river. Edeans 06:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.