Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  17:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Twing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails corp/org standards - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Below is the concerns I listed on the talk page:  Notability/importance concern  While vertical serach is a valid concept that requires an article, what about this company makes it notable? Links concern
 * first link http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2156351 nothing about Twing
 * second link http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3624377 nothing about Twing.
 * third link, http://gigaom.com/2005/03/16/3554/, a GigaOM entry, doesn't mention "Twing" at all.

References concern Both references address search engine theory; the statements utilizing these references do not talk about Twing at all.

Nothing in this article supports the notability of Twing. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Go points Tony, I can't locate anything that would establish notability either.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 12:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, at least for now. I've used this software to search a forum I help run; but it's probably not notable. It does work fairly well so it may become notable in the future, but per WP:Crystal I think it needs to establish some notability first. Credo From Start    talk  13:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, since the references don't talk about Twing. Notability has not been shown from reliable sources. EdJohnston (talk) 14:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not sign of notability. SunCreator (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.