Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TwitArt.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

TwitArt.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable website. Only mentioned in passing or in a list. Little, if any coverage from reliable sources. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The sourcing in the article s woefully inadequate to show notability. My own searches turn up nothing better. -- Whpq (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable website with promotional content. The conjecture in the article makes it hard to determine whether this is a company or a website, but the latter is true. Fails all points of WP:NWEB –Ammarpad (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.