Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two-Timing Touch and Broken Bones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Davewild (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Two-Timing Touch and Broken Bones

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Song hit number 44 in UK, but didn't chart anywhere else, shown here. Its use in a video game is pretty trivial. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  13:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Charting in the top 50 in the UK is a clear sign of notability. Edward321 (talk) 02:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Traditionally, it's the top 40 that's a big deal, so I'd say number 44 in only one country is borderline. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  03:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Hives discography per WP:NALBUM. Song is not notable and thus it should be redirected to the album, on which the song can be found. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  12:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to The Hives discography, as per WP:NSONGS, which states that: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." If the redirect is reverted, an admin can always protect the page. Redirect Tyrannosaurus Hives to The Hives discography, since it doesn't have enough content to meet WP:NALBUM--hkr Laozi speak  17:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - could probably be expanded on somewhat, and I would like a shot at it. Hopefully it doesn't get deleted beforehand... - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment rewrote and added refs/info. I think it may be enough for an article. - Theornamentalist (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Now - While I still question notability, The Ornamentalist has made a good article out of it. The info about the music video (which charted much higher than the song) helps. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  02:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Theornamentalist's improvements. --Europe22 (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.