Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two-stage model of free will


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Two-stage model of free will

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another random assortion of quotation apparently supporting the topic, but all searches lead to Bob Doyle (inventor), who seems to have created the page, and whose own article is also nominated for deletion, or a small group of writers on quantum indeterminacy. The field is not large enough to be notable, in my view, is probably WP:FRINGE, and in any case very few of the quotes actually support the subject. Peter Damian (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom —Мандичка YO 😜 19:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Classic WP:OR. jps (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia doesn't publish original theories. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 03:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an essay (WP:OR). Johnuniq (talk) 09:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see secondary sources discussing the topic, only primary sources to construct WP:OR. Ward20 (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. The user created other dubious articles with the same format and problems: Do otherwise in the same circumstances, Alternative possibilities, and Free will in antiquity. His biography of Randolph Clarke looks very thin on notability. His articles Self-determination (philosophy), Dilemma of determinism, and Freedom of action should be examined with an eye to whether the topics are representative of philosophical thought, or whether they, too, are a patchwork of synthesis. His abandoned user draft at User:Cmsreview/Free will models should be deleted. Binksternet (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I am aware of those articles, but using this one as a straw man. Also, I don't know how to nominate more than one article for deletion Peter Damian (talk) 21:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have nominated all of these for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 04:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per NOR. Sarah (SV) (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Snowded  TALK 04:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Philosophy of Science? Page differs. VandVictory (talk) 04:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.