Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Blue Lines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Two Blue Lines

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable 22 minute movie from Articles for deletion/J.C. Monaghan, which I just nominated for AfD, as well. No proof of notability. All references are to own website. Best of luck to Mr. Monaghan's future work but I'm afraid nothing justifies him being on Wikipedia at this point. mboverload @ 06:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am the original author of the page. This film is an important and major educational resource package and is gaining attention in the education sector as a valuable resource.  There is unfortunately not a lot of information available for educators about the project and I aimed to try to create a valuable point of reference.  Due to the closed nature of the industry, attention is largely verbal, but the increasing nature of the attention means that nearer the time of publication (october) it is highly likely that there will be more notable references, and this resource will more fully meet the notability reqs.  If necessary I will take the page back to my userspace and hold it and build it until such a time it completely meets the standards.  I recommend keeping the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aquila92 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Mboverload nothing at this time establishes notability. serialrage @ 07:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NF.  I am not opposed to moving the article to Aquila92's user space to give him time to find references once the film is released.  Movementarian (Talk) 08:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy and Delete. Post-release, if reliable sources are forthcoming it can then be recreated as an article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy User:Boing! said Zebedee offers a solution that acknowledges the good faith efforts of the author and allows a return when notability is met.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely unnotable film that fails WP:NF and WP:N and seems unlikely to ever do so. User has already copied it back to their user space, so userification unnecessary. Would recommend Aquila92 review WP:COI though, due to his seeming inside knowledge of both the film and Monaghan. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 18:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.