Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Cent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, fails WP:COMIC Madchester 06:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Two Cent
nn webcomic, no alexa webdata, one google hit. Fails to meet WP:COMIC by a large, large margin. Delete. RasputinAXP talk contribs 18:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --DelftUser 18:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * "one google hit" argument invalid - specific web links only show one result in google. Searching "two cent comic" in google yields more than one result for the actual comic. unsigned comment by
 * Comment: OK, still one hit. Put "two cent in quotes bu itself and you get two, one self-referential. Those are pretty common words. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 19:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Your link still gives more than one result. (unsigned comment by )
 * Only one that references the webcomic in the first five pages. The rest, since they're not actually referencing the comic in question, don't count. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 02:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all this self-published stuff. Ruby 19:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Why shouldn't there be a web-encyclopedia for small groups too? Define popularity. (unsigned comment by )
 * There is. There's your own website for that and you can install any wiki you want on it. Wikipedia has requirements for notability. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 02:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Latinus 23:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I do have to disagree with the basis of deletion because of no data from alexa, as Wikipedia states that can't fairly be used as a basis for deletion. The Google results also isn't entirely valid and can only be used for a rough guess. But, the Wikipedia Comics notability requirements do fail to be met. So, as much as I hate to say it, I have to agree that it needs to be Deleted. Amnesiasoft 05:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Amnesiasoft, not for nom. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 23:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.