Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Kinds of People


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 00:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Two Kinds of People

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Disam page that doesn't link to any articles Sploooshman 08:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * abstain - can't tell if it should be killed or not; not like it's doing any harm here. Guroadrunner 08:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Although it doesn't disambiguate between two articles, it disambiguates between two subjects which are covered in other, linked articles (in this case the albums the songs belong on. Weak keep, unless it can be shown by policies that disambiguating by article-less subject is A Bad ThingTM. -- saberwyn 11:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Changing to weak delete per Mandsford below. -- saberwyn 00:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Gotta agree with the Splooshter on this one... not like it's doing any good here, serving to disambiguate between two things that don't merit their own article. Is extending disambiguation by article-less subject "A Bad Thing"?  Extrapolating this would show that the answer is yes... imagine what it opens the door for.  It has been said that "Wikipedia is not a dictionary", and this is analogous to looking at Webster's and seeing that a word can refer to more than one meaning.  Mandsford 13:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete don't see why it's here. OysterGuitarst 22:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the two meanings don't have any article and neither seems to be notable songs, unless I'm wrong.--JForget 01:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. DAB pages are not needed for unimportant subjects. Neither song has its own article, and neither is covered extensively in either of the linked articles. Album names (as opposed to song names) might be worth disambiguating, though. EdJohnston 01:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary, per above. Bearian 00:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.