Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Tube


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to RTÉ2. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guideline, but a redirect is reasonable. Davewild (talk) 08:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Two Tube

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Absence of any coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, never mind significant coverage. Most of the people named aren't even notable (one redirects to a pop group which doesn't mention it, another to a failed election candidate). Greykit (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to RTÉ2, of which this show does not seem to be independently notable. Most coverage in reliable sources I could find is about the hosts and so does not count toward notability that much. Everymorning   talk  03:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect This is a notable show on RTE2 and it is popular also. The article itself however is poor and lacks sources. I would suggest it be given a section on the RTÉ2 page and that the page Two Tube be made a redirect. However I would include as a proviso that before this page becomes a redirect a new section must be created on the page RTÉ2. Currently the Rte page only links to this article and so making it a redirect would be essentially sending people around in a circle. This subject must have its own section to redirect to. Thank you Trout71 (talk) 14:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It is mentioned there under the heading "Teenage television" so the link could be removed. That it is notable is not clear, hence the AfD. That it is popular is of no significance either. Notability on Wikipedia. "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity... if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article." --Greykit (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I can't see how the "Teenage television" section can be expanded without violating the policy WP:UNDUE (the same sentence mentions 5 other shows so the current weight given is just about right). Regarding notability, there are no reliable sources - either there or in the subject article. --Inother (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.