Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two X


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -Scottywong | babble _ 18:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Two X

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON. This group was announced August 11, made their first appearance just over a week ago, and first album released last Monday. Lots of info about five living people here (including birthdates and bloodtypes), and no sources to speak of. Article appears to have links to 16 articles in other languages, but only the Korean one exists. This is in my mind entirely promotional material, but since the group works for J.Tune Camp (Rain's music label), I didn't tag for speedy. A reasonable search for sources is hindered by the vast number of unrelated hits drawn by the common connection between "Two" and "X". BusterD (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The underscore in the deletion text above is a bug in the code for NewPagesFeed tool which I used to create this process. BusterD (talk) 15:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have removed quite a bit of BLP information such as height/weight, birth date, family members, and blood type (??) in accordance with WP:BLP and because it is unencyclopedic to the point of being ridiculous. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't understand of why Two X article should be deleted. I mean all the BLP information about the members of this group was previously revealed by J.Tune Camp (Rain's music label)through their official cafe which I've provide the source link on external links column. But of cause its in korean language and I myself translated those infos. If the arguments is because this group had just debuted over a week ago I really have to disagree on this. Other groups for such SKARF and AOA (band) also debuted at the same time but I can see there's no problem on their article released. &mdash; 6to5mboys Talk 13:29, 28 August 2012 (KST)
 * Both those articles are up for deletion under same basic criteria. Wikipedia is not a directory of new bands. BusterD (talk) 13:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Then how long should we wait so that we can actually create a wikipedia page for new bands/musicians? &mdash; 6to5mboys Talk 17:54, 29 August 2012 (KST) —Preceding undated comment added 08:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes point two of WP:BAND. "Double Up" charted and peaked at number 22 on the albums chart. . — ξ xplicit  22:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Google News turns up some potential sources such as this. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 11:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or userfy per WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON, notwithstanding the achievements of the group members. Note that WP:BAND states A musician or ensemble ... may be notable... (my emphasis). GNG is still needed. I found nothing in reliable sources, although I admit that the generic name and non-English aspect don't aid searches. -- Trevj (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.