Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two for the 15


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 11:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Two for the 15
Someone had tagged this as patent nonsense. Technically it isin't but the amount of sense to be got from it is very tenuous Fil e  Éireann 20:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I tagged it as nonsense, because it is. Ryanjunk 20:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not speedy but at normal speed, uncommon phrase. Punkmorten 20:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it doesn't look like nonsense, but definitely desn't look notable. ikh (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with all due speed. Ikkyu2 21:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't speedy, because it's not nonsense. Just stupid. --Ashenai 00:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, though there's nothing remotely nonsensical about it. Flapdragon 02:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It may be nonsense, it may even be complete bollocks but it isn't patent nonsense, and thus isn't a speedy deletion. No context. Stifle 01:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.