Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two shadows the chosen one


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Two shadows the chosen one

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable self-published book lacking GHITs and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK.  ttonyb (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Sadads (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete While a self-published book can be notable, they are the exception rather than the rule. The complete lack of independent sourcing shows this is not one of those exceptions. Edward321 (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a non-notable book without any third-party reliable source. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG Hekerui (talk) 10:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.