Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twodeadsluts Onegoodfuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete all. Stifle (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Twodeadsluts Onegoodfuck
Non-notable per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 04:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Adding I_Stuck_My_Boner_In_The_Blender_%22The_Pinkest_Demo_Ever%22, The_Mystery_of_the_Lost_Maps_Means_Battle_For_The:_HOMOROBOTS, and The_Homorobotic_Adventure_Squad_Presents:_Songs_For_Blastings_Lasers_and_Fighting_Evil_Doers to this AFD as they are their albums. kotepho 05:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep How many states do you need to hit to be a 'national' tour? They seem to be covering a decent amount from their website.  On a somewhat related note, the reviews are hilarious. kotepho 05:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not impressed by national tour, don't think they meet WP:MUSIC, but agree that the reviews are absolutely hilarious. -- Samir  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px]]   (the scope)  05:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Intrigued as I am by these "belligerent mental patients on a meth-binge" (as one review puts it), they clearly fail WP:BAND.   dbtfz talk 06:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The 90's didn't produce much in the way of quality music.  The 00's weren't looking so good either.  These guys redress that problem.  I just listened to "Let's Just Hold Each..." and it really spoke to me. Rklawton 06:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sadly, I've only heard two of their samples so I cannot comment on their music much.. but WP:MUSIC is the issue not if they are any good. kotepho 06:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all per Samir. Eusebeus 10:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, nn band and per Samir. --Ter e nce Ong 14:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, fails to achieve the level of notability required by WP:MUSIC.   Proto    ||    type    14:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - as above. For great justice. 16:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC with a strong push to BJAODN.--Isotope23 17:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as per nom and Kotepho. --P199 17:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Band vanity. Piccadilly 19:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't get this policy. Just because they aren't mainstream doesn't mean they aren't an interesting, different band. I think it's stupid to judge bands by how popular they are. Twodeadsluts keep it real by staying underground. Also, seeing as they are not a large band, information on them is almost nil therefore making this page more useful than ones for bands that people already know tons about and could find on countless websites. Also, "band vanity" is a violation of the amendment of freedom of expression. If people found their name offensive, they would not be interested in listening to them thus having no reason to look up information on them.  The Metro 20:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nobody has cited the coarse name as a reason for deletion, and I'm sure everyone would agree that the band appears to be "interesting and different" in the extreme. Notability is the sole issue here.  If you disagree with WP:BAND, that's fine, but don't attack straw men.   dbtfz talk 01:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)  Oh, and regarding the appeal to the First Amendment, see WP:FREE.  I'll shut up now.  :-)   dbtfz talk 01:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Someone stated "band vanity" as a reason. I must have misinterpreted it. The Metro 20:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Another reason I have for this being kept is that while this band doesn't apply to the [WP:Music]] statement, a lot of bands on here don't. Also they have done the following; Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). Said information can be viewed here. The Metro 21:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Already voted once above. Thanks.  --  Samir  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px]]   (the scope)  03:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above. --Khoikhoi 03:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep ALL, meets WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 03:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Which part? Kotepho 03:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Media and tour, and that's without putting much effort in. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 04:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I definitely agree with the touring. If you look at their Myspace you can see that they are actually currently touring a large portion of the U.S. They can even be quoted to saying "The band is planning on bringing the live show to both coasts in 2006." Also, they have been mentioned in multiple reputable sources of press as stated above. The Metro 00:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I disagree about notability and don't but the multiple reputable sources of press at all. Barry Zuckerkorn 19:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * How are the sources not reputable? They have been reviewed by quite a few places. And they most be notable if they are touring the whole country and all of their old albums are sold out. The Metro 18:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC and Alexa.-- Dakota ~  °  23:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not see how they can fail WP:MUSIC seeing as they are currently touring the country. The Metro 1:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.