Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ty Fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Ty Fox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable performer. Significant RS coverage not found. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. Awards listed are not significant; Grabby Awards and Men in Video do not qualify. Minor controversy does not rise to encyclopedia notability either. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep He may not pass PORNBIO, but he meets GNG for the coverage of his firing and for the material in the "Out at Work" book about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). In addition to the WaPo article and the citation to the book which appear in the article currently, WP:BEFORE research would have turned up at least these other reliable sources: COACH'S FIRING PLANNED (Washington Post), The Fruits of His Labors (Washington City Paper), and Beyond Gay: "Deviant" Sex and the Politics of the ENDA Workplace (article in the scholarly journal Social Text). I think the Post and City Paper about the outing and the two scholarly refs about ENDA are enough for our notability guidelines. David in DC (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no proper indication of notability outside of the controversy, failing WP:1E. The one bluelinked production company in his filmography lists no films there, and there are no articles about any of the films in his filmography. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails the notability guidelines for pornographic actors, and the GNG appeal just does not work in this case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP1E PORNBIO and GNG Spartaz Humbug! 09:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.