Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tygon Tubing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep and Improve I hope all of you go there and boldly do it. (non-admin, per WP:SNOW) Cerejota (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Tygon Tubing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Thinly veiled advertisement for a brand of flexible tubing. The only sources provided in the article are primary ones. I've had a look on Google and found enough to prove the thing exists, but no substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources that would justify an article here. Wikipedia is not a product catalog. Reyk YO!  19:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. My earlier attempts to rescue this proved fruitless, it has to go. ukexpat (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep major medical and biolaboratory standard product. see, , ,   for examples.DGG (talk) 20:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. This article is about a notable product and can be improved. My complaint with it is that it continually attracts linkspam from an IP address with a conflict of interest (belonging to Professional Plastics, which evidently sells the product). I wouldn't be sorry if it disappeared, even though the subject might be somewhat worthy of inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is tubing capitalized? ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Standard in medical/scientific/lab settings, as well as some forms of motorsports. tedder (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, but improve it. I came here to find out the temperature rang of various types of tubing as my application requires going from -30 degrees C to 80 degrees C. These kinds of basics should be convered here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.74.213.98 (talk) 22:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. It's obviously not going to get deleted, so why not improve it? -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 04:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * People have tried and failed. Reyk  YO!  04:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.