Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Bleszinski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. J I P | Talk 11:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Tyler Bleszinski

 * Delete - contested prod. Not particularly notable creator of a not particularly notable blog. Wickethewok 07:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - How can somebody be mentioned in Sports Illustrated twice 3/21/2006 and 3/01/2005 (registration required for both), New York Times 4/18/2005 and numerous mentions in several West Coast newspapers be not notable?Dspserpico 08:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - perhaps the article should be on the blog then? Not the blogger? Wickethewok 08:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - but isn't a blog an extension of the blogger? Dspserpico 08:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - if he is only notable for being associated with the blog, having an article about him serves no purpose if there was an article about the blog. Wickethewok 08:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - The problem is this, Bleszinski is one only two bona fide bloggers I know of who has had press credentials who are not also journalists. Is that notoriety associated with a blog, or notoriety associated with a person?  Also, recent mentions on Sports Illustrated talk about person's actions as a blogger, not about the blog itself. Dspserpico 08:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 *  Weak Keep. Notability marginally established through articles about his blog. That said, there's probably only enough information for one article about the blog/blogger, and I'm not sure which should be the primary article name. Of course, that's a separate discussion. --Alan Au 08:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable journalist. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  15:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.