Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Cymet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Rob e  rt  16:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Tyler Cymet
Delete. Totally self-promotional Daniel Case 16:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a nn-bio, but no notability can be found (yet?). feydey 20:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite Needs to be NPOVed but seems to be notable enough to keep.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have rewritten the article based on information I could find on the web.  He notablity is now listed in the article, not 100% that it merits inclusion but I don;t see the harm.  Movementarian 22:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep How is this self-promotional if Tyler Cymet didn't write it? I wrote the original article. Sorry about the formatting, this is my first article. PiMaster3 22:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, people don't always log in under their own names. Daniel Case 03:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- current revision looks OK to me. delldot | talk 15:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Extremely weak keep. There is some notability here but this is a stretch. -- DS1953 06:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.